Would there be any reason for a trustee not to sue to have large payments clawed back and distributed equally amongst all creditors?
I made an additional $20000 worth of payments to credit cards that were over min payments all within 90 days of filing. I would prefer these payments be clawed back and equally dispersed mainly because I have student loans that will not be discharged.
If BK is supposed to treat a student loan the same as all other unsecured/non prioritized debt, isn’t avoiding crawl back unfavorable to them as a creditor?
I’d prefer it because in the end it means less interest accruing. Without it, chances are when I finish my plan, I’ll still be at the same amount of overall debt owed because the student loans won’t be discharged.
Is there a way for me to get the trustee to crawl back?
submitted by /u/SnooGadgets4245
[link] [comments]